The answer must be Noll since according to Amazon, customers who preordered his book also bought books by John Piper. But those who preordered the others also bought books by NT Wright. Does that count as a face jab? Hart owns a category to himself, and must remain unalloyed and free from admixture. His inclusion on any list, self serving aside, only dilutes and obscures the glory of his meticulously groomed contrarian image.
I have also personally witnessed DGH consume a box lunch, so I have first hand knowledge that he physically exists. I have never seen the others, and for all I know they may be cyberspace phantoms. The other two posed for their own pictures. Hart hired a stunt-double — Andy Griffith, it looks like. John, I think it means that MM does questionable climate research. Jeff, are you trying to confuse me, enlighten me or just make light of the whole MM mystery? BTW, I nominate you as the winner of the book- I think that was the most humorous post.
Make light. I kind of like tulips in the gardening sense so I will plant them if I want. According to Randall van der Sterran, over at the Outhouse, you should treat us Lutherans like the plague. I kind of like the Calvinists I know too so I will continue my dialog with them regardless. Michael M and John Y. But, Darryl, maybe you could go by more gospel than law here and dole out the freebie to someone who simply asks.
You know, you without money, come and buy without price and all that? Zrim: But, Darryl, maybe you could go by more gospel than law here and dole out the freebie to someone who simply asks. You should only apply gospel principles to Christian religious books. Civilized, principled conversation can be chafing; this has been fun.
DGH, normally I am not an autograph kind of guy, but an autographed half book would be hilarious. Give me the first half because I really won. Give Yeazel the rear end for obvious reasons. Bill beat me to it again like he did on the reformation is over bit - I was going to suggest you give the book to MM in order not to deface the value of the book but with the not so secret intent that you would end up giving the book to me. You know what comes out of a rear end- right at you MM.
Jeff, fair point. But if law should rule this decision then I would suggest that maybe those OldLifers who have earned banishment at the Bayly Blog like DGH himself be considered.
Dirty Darryl. His is the only book that has a gushing blurb from Michael Cromartie. Mark A. Now thou hast traveled beyond the pale into the nether lands with thy foul derision. Trade establishments dost not author fair writ. Nor dost the wise soul procurest his treasures therein for Amazon maketh a better steward by far.
I wanna believe, just as much as anyone else, that an individual can make a change and become a better person. Having said that Just in case anyone thinks there's a chance in hell that Imus will mend his ways, I direct you to this video clip.
In , Imus and company aired one of their "Cardinal Egan" bits. For those of you who don't listen to the program, this is a weekly comedy skit where the show's executive producer, Bernard McGuirk, sticks a Fed Ex envelope on his head and imitates Outscored the competition by more than 70 runs.
Defeated Wethersfield and Madison in the first two games of the sectional by a combined Ah, but because of this arbitrary format, undefeated Mystic found itself in a winner-take-all championship game earlier this week against one-loss Madison. Here is the level of absurdity: In the winner-take-all game, Mystic yielded a run to Madison in the first inning and fell behind I turned to my longtime friend Tom Doyle, whose grandsons Dylan and Liam play for Mystic and said this:.
But we really did everything we were supposed to do, and it comes down to a winner take all. Everywhere in the journey of the Little League process is double elimination except for the sectionals. I just don't feel like that's in the spirit of the Little League philosophy.
Hence, it's time for our state Little League poohbahs to awaken and understand the concept of equity: a fair baseline of competition. Note the difference between equity fairness and equality where everybody achieves the same. Equity ought to be sacrosanct. Equality is impossible and leads to the "everybody should get a trophy" drivel. This is about equity. The undefeated team gains no advantage from being undefeated.
The one-loss team has no disadvantage for losing. Now I'm all for the vagaries of the counterintuitive lifestyle, but where's the equity in benefitting by losing? And please: don't bother with the "both teams played by the same rules" act.
Also irrelevant. The rule needs to be changed for the aforementioned reasons. Once again: If you can possibly lose a four-day, three-game tournament by allowing one entire run, you have a flawed system. Not to mention how such "sectionals" are formed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options Tiger Fan Posted October 26, Yankee23Fan Posted October 26, On the topic of Imus defending gay marriage. Bernie to Imus: It sounds like your position is on your knees.
The Z Machine Posted October 26, Dirt McGirt? DCThunder Posted October 26, I haven't listened to Imus in about a year, so what's the latest on: 1. Deidre's campaign to put "green cleaning products" in all hospitals, but especially the Hackensack Medical Center, 4th Largest Hospital in the Entire World 3.
0コメント